讨论串中一开始有人问了那Oathbound Paladin和Sacred Servant可以叠吗,然后又有人问了Oath和其他Oath怎么办
Mark回Oath本身就有说明可互相叠加,至于Oathbound Paladin和Sacred Servant,他要带到会议上讨论,然后至此没下文。
的确没有下文
不过似乎联系mark的发言
好像是他们讨论的结果就是faq多了最后一句话
(As always, individual GMs should feel free to houserule to allow small overlaps on a case by case basis, but the underlying rule exists due to the unpredictability of combining these changes.)
虽然对pfs没用来着233
我现在倾向于誓言也不能叠,因为FAQ>设计师发言>规则
(简而言之就是P子吃书了)
哪怕誓言能叠,奥能可选项增加能叠,
也并不与FAQ中的“This even applies for something as small as adding 1 extra round of bardic performance each day, adding an additional bonus feat to the list of bonus feats you can select, or adding an additional class skill to the class”等内容不能叠
相矛盾。
原因我说了,alter的定义不同。增加法术选项和增加奥能选项,既没有真的“alter”母能力,也不在FAQ列举的“最极端(this even applies!)的看起来能叠其实不能叠的例子”里。